2012/6/7 Lech Lorens <[email protected]> > > On 7 June 2012 16:09, David Pineau <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > While configuring my indentation, I came across a behaviour that seemed > > unintuitive to me (I did not manage to find anything related to this on the > > mailling lists, sorry if I missed it). > > > > When a value in the cinoptions string is described as a shiftwidth value, > > the value cannot be zero. > > This means that if I write "cino=n0s", the indentation behaves as if I wrote > > "cino=n1s". > > > > Reading the code (in the latest vim mercurial trunk), I found that if the > > value and the fraction were equal to 0 when the 's' character is present, > > then the value is set to 1 by default. I am aware that writing "n0s" instead > > of "n0" may be a stretch, but I found this behaviour disturbing. > > > > Is this behaviour intended, or is it a unlucky side-effect of the default 1 > > shiftwidth width when only the s is present ? > > > > In the second case, I wrote a little patch that should be easy to apply and > > check (Patch retrieved from a mercurial patch queue), that I will join to my > > next message if you deem it useful :) > > Admittedly, I did not read the message carefully. I just fixed it to > find out that you already did that. > Next time just go ahead and attach the patch.
In my patch, I didn't update the tests, so it may have been for the best. > > > I guess the behaviour is an unintended side-effect so I attach my > version of the patch. > Test 3 updated. Thanks for the answer/confirmation and for the fix ! -- David Pineau -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
