Nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> NeXT was a niche player at best and their OS ran on a very limited range  of
> PCs and peripherals that they did not produce, and SGI never ported  IRIX to
> x86 (big mistake - x86 SGIs only run Win2k).  This is a very  different
> situation, and I am cautiously optimistic.

Mistake? No way. IRIX isn't (wasn't) SGI's selling point, it is (was) their
exotic and extremely powerful (graphics) hardware.

On 2005-06-08 16:59, Michael Hackett wrote:

> These are good points. I forgot that SGI was running NT on their x86 boxes. No
> wonder none of their loyal users switched. :-)

They weren't supposed to. The Visual Workstations were intended to tap into
the growing NT market of the time.

,xtG
.tsooJ
-- 
When someone asks if you're a god, say "yes."
-- 
Joost van de Griek
<http://www.jvdg.net/>




-- 
Vintage Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com   | Enter To Win A |
 -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299   |  Free iBook!   |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Vintage Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagemacs.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/vintage.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

iPod Accessories for Less
at 1-800-iPOD.COM
Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal
www.1800ipod.com

Reply via email to