I sent this yesterday, but it didn't make it to the list for some reason...
> Anyway, in z/VM 5.1, I need a subnet mask and subnet value for this. It > doesn't seem simple. This VM image will have 192.168.193.3. My initial > guess is a subnet mask of 0.0.255.0 and a subnet value of 0.0.3.0 but > that didn't work in my first test. (At this point I don't know if the > "level 3 guy" made the changes correctly or if I didn't make the changes > right. (Right now, this is on the unused IFL side, so I have time for > testing.) Eventually, I'll put in VM's vswitch for support of the Linux > images. I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to define a route for, so I'll answer the two possibilities that I can come up with: If you want to define a route to the 192.168.193.0 subnet (with a BSD subnet mask of 255.255.255.0), the VM subnet mask you would use on the gateway statement would be 0 and you would omit the subnet value (since 192. is a class C address range) If you want to define a route to the 192.168.192/22 supernet, your VM subnet mask would be 0.0.3.0 and your subnet value would be 0 Regards, Miguel Diaz z/VM TCP/IP Development
