At 11:38 PM 2/14/00 -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote:
>At 12:22 AM -0500 2/15/2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >At 03:02 PM 2/14/00 -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote:
> >>This assumes 6.2 can be made to swallow the Perl source.
> >
> >It can--a quick CC :== CC/NOWARN is enough to do it. Not a great option,
> and now that I've got Dec C 6.2 I plan on fixing that.
>
>With pragmas to ignore specific warnings or whacking at the code until it
>follows the rules?
Whacking the code. I'd just as soon avoid pragmas in this case, and I think
a few simple code whacks will do it. (Plus it'll help out the AS/400 folks,
so that won't be a bad thing)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: patch proposal for podifying README.vms Dan Sugalski
- Re: patch proposal for podifying README.vms Craig A. Berry
- Re: patch proposal for podifying README.vms Dan Sugalski
- Re: patch proposal for podifying README.vms PVHP
- Re: patch proposal for podifying README.vms Dan Sugalski
- Re: patch proposal for podifying README.vms PVHP
- Re: patch proposal for podifying README.vms Dan Sugalski
- Re: patch proposal for podifying README.vms Craig A. Berry
- Re: patch proposal for podifying README.vms Dan Sugalski
- Re: patch proposal for podifying README.vm... Craig A. Berry
- Re: patch proposal for podifying READ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: patch proposal for podifying README.vms John Hasstedt
- Re: patch proposal for podifying README.vms PVHP
