On Dec 24, 2012, at 5:45 AM, Thomas Pfau <tfp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tests completed.  Results are in http://nbpfaus.net/~pfau/perltest.zip

And the summary is:

t/comp/parser ................................................. 
FAILED--unexpected output at test 0
t/op/stat ..................................................... FAILED at test 
31
t/op/taint .................................................... 
FAILED--unexpected output at test 531
t/porting/manifest ............................................ FAILED at test 
58
cpan/Archive-Extract/t/01_Archive-Extract ..................... FAILED at test 
28
cpan/autodie/t/Fatal .......................................... 
FAILED--expected test 15, saw test 17
cpan/CPANPLUS-Dist-Build/t/02_CPANPLUS-Dist-Build ............. FAILED at test 4
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/00_CPANPLUS-Internals-Utils ................... FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/01_CPANPLUS-Configure ......................... FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/02_CPANPLUS-Internals ......................... FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/03_CPANPLUS-Internals-Source .................. FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/04_CPANPLUS-Module ............................ FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/05_CPANPLUS-Internals-Fetch ................... FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/06_CPANPLUS-Internals-Constants ............... FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/07_CPANPLUS-Internals-Extract ................. FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/08_CPANPLUS-Backend ........................... FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/09_CPANPLUS-Internals-Search .................. FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/10_CPANPLUS-Error ............................. FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/15_CPANPLUS-Shell ............................. FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/19_CPANPLUS-Dist .............................. FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/20_CPANPLUS-Dist-MM ........................... FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/21_CPANPLUS-Dist-No-Build ..................... FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/25_CPANPLUS ................................... FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/30_CPANPLUS-Internals-Selfupdate .............. FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/CPANPLUS/t/40_CPANPLUS-Internals-Report .................. FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/File-Path/t/Path ......................................... FAILED at test 
66
cpan/Module-Build/t/files ..................................... 
FAILED--expected 4 tests, saw 0
cpan/Module-Build/t/manifypods ................................ FAILED at test 
11
cpan/Module-Build/t/PL_files .................................. 
FAILED--expected 8 tests, saw 0
cpan/Module-Build/t/properties/dist_suffix .................... FAILED at test 2
cpan/Module-Build/t/runthrough ................................ FAILED at test 
11
cpan/Module-Build/t/tilde ..................................... FAILED at test 
16
cpan/Module-Metadata/t/metadata ............................... FAILED at test 
114
cpan/Test-Harness/t/unicode ................................... FAILED--no 
leader found
cpan/Time-HiRes/t/alarm ....................................... FAILED at test 7
cpan/Time-HiRes/t/ualarm ...................................... FAILED at test 8
dist/Cwd/t/cwd ................................................ FAILED at test 
23
dist/ExtUtils-Command/t/cp .................................... FAILED at test 1
lib/File/Copy ................................................. 
FAILED--expected 463 tests, saw 27
lib/File/Find/t/find .......................................... FAILED at test 
10
lib/File/Find/t/taint ......................................... FAILED at test 
10
lib/perl5db ................................................... FAILED at test 
18
lib/vmsish .................................................... FAILED at test 
22
Failed 43 tests out of 2155, 98.00% okay.

Which is a lot more than I usually get.  In fact here's what I get for my 
recent build of 5.16.2 on Alpha 8.3:

t/op/stat ..................................................... FAILED at test 
82
cpan/Archive-Extract/t/01_Archive-Extract ..................... FAILED at test 
115
cpan/Module-Build/t/PL_files .................................. FAILED at test 3
cpan/Module-Build/t/properties/dist_suffix .................... FAILED at test 2
cpan/Module-Build/t/runthrough ................................ FAILED at test 
11
cpan/Module-Build/t/tilde ..................................... FAILED at test 
16
cpan/Module-Metadata/t/metadata ............................... FAILED at test 
114
ext/Pod-Html/t/cache .......................................... FAILED at test 8
lib/perl5db ................................................... FAILED at test 
18
Failed 9 tests out of 2111, 99.57% okay.

To account for the differences, one would have to methodically go through the 
very large matrix of, in no particular order:

1.) Volume characteristics of the build volume, notably ODS-2 versus ODS-5, but 
assuming ODS-5, are access dates enabled, etc.
2.) VMS version and ECO level.
3.) CRTL ECO level.
4.) Extended parse enabled or not.
5.) Compiler version.
6.) Presence or absence of what versions of certain external utilities, notably 
tar.
7.) What DECC$* features, if any, are enabled.
8.) Complete configuration output from perl -"V".

A large number of the failures I'm not getting involve stat() calls, and I 
think there have been fixes in this area, and the Time::HiRes failures 
definitely point to a bug in the CRTL that has been fixed.  So getting a 
current CRTL ECO would probably be the one thing to focus on if any of these 
test failures is a concern.
________________________________________
Craig A. Berry
mailto:craigbe...@mac.com

"... getting out of a sonnet is much more
 difficult than getting in."
                 Brad Leithauser

Reply via email to