I would be concerned about the IP infringement lawsuit they lost to Genband. My experience hasn't been good with them when using other application servers.
Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 22, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Brandon Buckner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just curious: Is there a reason to avoid Metaswitch? > > My main experience is in Metaswitch and Sonus, but in Metaswitch it was > limited to the 2510 and 3510 gateways and the accompanying servers up to 7.4 > software and none of the newer blade platforms. At the time I would have said > that Metaswitch would have worked quite well for what is being asked, > especially if wanting to split across many smaller gateways and > geographically distributed. Is there something with the new hardware and/or > software I don't know about quality-wise? > > Sonus killed off the GSX4000 which would have lent better to spreading around > a bunch of smaller boxes. They still have the GSX9000 which goes up to single > OC-3 cards (so you'd have to have a couple to split an OC-48 still), but > their main push seems to be the SBC5210 and SBC7000 which are IP only, no > TDM. But spread across gateways the call processing can easily do the 500 > CPS. > >> On 4/21/2016 5:00 AM, Anthony Orlando via VoiceOps wrote: >> Avoid Meta at all cost. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Paul Timmins <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You're going to handle 500CPS of legacy sonet based TDM and question >>> dropping 7 figures on the solution? *cringes* >>> >>> This is literally what platforms like metaswitch, sonus and many others are >>> made for. If you're looking for low cost, Taqua's solution is decent, and >>> if you need to take that entire OC-48, you're all but eyeballs deep in >>> Sonus or Metaswitch land. >>> >>> -Paul >>> >>>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 17:54, Brooks Bridges <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Looking for suggestions for NEBS compliant gear that can support SS7, >>>> handle OC-3 or higher levels of channels, and can support (in aggregate) >>>> up to around 500 cps through a *good* (key word) SIP interface. I’m >>>> willing to entertain the idea of a single larger device that can take a >>>> full OC-48 and support the full 500 cps, but I’d prefer spread the load >>>> across multiple devices and smaller interfaces for load balancing and >>>> redundancy. >>>> >>>> Any pointers? Obviously there are products out there by the really big >>>> players, but I’d really rather not have to drop 7 figures on this project >>>> unless I have to. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Brooks Bridges | Sr. Voice Services Engineer >>>> O1 Communications >>>> 5190 Golden Foothill Pkwy >>>> El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 >>>> office: 916.235.2097 | main: 888.444.1111, Option 2 >>>> email: [email protected] | web: www.o1.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> VoiceOps mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >>> _______________________________________________ >>> VoiceOps mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> VoiceOps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
