Avoid Meta at all cost. Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Paul Timmins <[email protected]> wrote: > > You're going to handle 500CPS of legacy sonet based TDM and question dropping > 7 figures on the solution? *cringes* > > This is literally what platforms like metaswitch, sonus and many others are > made for. If you're looking for low cost, Taqua's solution is decent, and if > you need to take that entire OC-48, you're all but eyeballs deep in Sonus or > Metaswitch land. > > -Paul > >> On Apr 20, 2016, at 17:54, Brooks Bridges <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Looking for suggestions for NEBS compliant gear that can support SS7, handle >> OC-3 or higher levels of channels, and can support (in aggregate) up to >> around 500 cps through a *good* (key word) SIP interface. I’m willing to >> entertain the idea of a single larger device that can take a full OC-48 and >> support the full 500 cps, but I’d prefer spread the load across multiple >> devices and smaller interfaces for load balancing and redundancy. >> >> Any pointers? Obviously there are products out there by the really big >> players, but I’d really rather not have to drop 7 figures on this project >> unless I have to. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Brooks Bridges | Sr. Voice Services Engineer >> O1 Communications >> 5190 Golden Foothill Pkwy >> El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 >> office: 916.235.2097 | main: 888.444.1111, Option 2 >> email: [email protected] | web: www.o1.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> VoiceOps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
