I've used in the past. Good success with them. Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 22, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Calvin Ellison <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anyone using TelcoBridges gear? > > > > Regards, > > Calvin Ellison > Voice Operations Engineer > [email protected] > +1 (213) 285-0555 > > ----------------------------------------------- > voxox.com > 5825 Oberlin Drive, Suite 5 > San Diego, CA 92121 > > >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Brandon Buckner <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> Just curious: Is there a reason to avoid Metaswitch? >> >> My main experience is in Metaswitch and Sonus, but in Metaswitch it was >> limited to the 2510 and 3510 gateways and the accompanying servers up to 7.4 >> software and none of the newer blade platforms. At the time I would have >> said that Metaswitch would have worked quite well for what is being asked, >> especially if wanting to split across many smaller gateways and >> geographically distributed. Is there something with the new hardware and/or >> software I don't know about quality-wise? >> >> Sonus killed off the GSX4000 which would have lent better to spreading >> around a bunch of smaller boxes. They still have the GSX9000 which goes up >> to single OC-3 cards (so you'd have to have a couple to split an OC-48 >> still), but their main push seems to be the SBC5210 and SBC7000 which are IP >> only, no TDM. But spread across gateways the call processing can easily do >> the 500 CPS. >> >>> On 4/21/2016 5:00 AM, Anthony Orlando via VoiceOps wrote: >>> Avoid Meta at all cost. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Paul Timmins <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> You're going to handle 500CPS of legacy sonet based TDM and question >>>> dropping 7 figures on the solution? *cringes* >>>> >>>> This is literally what platforms like metaswitch, sonus and many others >>>> are made for. If you're looking for low cost, Taqua's solution is decent, >>>> and if you need to take that entire OC-48, you're all but eyeballs deep in >>>> Sonus or Metaswitch land. >>>> >>>> -Paul >>>> >>>>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 17:54, Brooks Bridges <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Looking for suggestions for NEBS compliant gear that can support SS7, >>>>> handle OC-3 or higher levels of channels, and can support (in aggregate) >>>>> up to around 500 cps through a *good* (key word) SIP interface. I’m >>>>> willing to entertain the idea of a single larger device that can take a >>>>> full OC-48 and support the full 500 cps, but I’d prefer spread the load >>>>> across multiple devices and smaller interfaces for load balancing and >>>>> redundancy. >>>>> >>>>> Any pointers? Obviously there are products out there by the really big >>>>> players, but I’d really rather not have to drop 7 figures on this project >>>>> unless I have to. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> Brooks Bridges | Sr. Voice Services Engineer >>>>> O1 Communications >>>>> 5190 Golden Foothill Pkwy >>>>> El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 >>>>> office: 916.235.2097 | main: 888.444.1111, Option 2 >>>>> email: [email protected] | web: www.o1.com >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> VoiceOps mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> VoiceOps mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> VoiceOps mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> VoiceOps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
