Anyone using TelcoBridges gear?
Regards, *Calvin Ellison* Voice Operations Engineer [email protected] +1 (213) 285-0555 ----------------------------------------------- *voxox.com <http://www.voxox.com/> * 5825 Oberlin Drive, Suite 5 San Diego, CA 92121 [image: Voxox] On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Brandon Buckner <[email protected]> wrote: > Just curious: Is there a reason to avoid Metaswitch? > > My main experience is in Metaswitch and Sonus, but in Metaswitch it was > limited to the 2510 and 3510 gateways and the accompanying servers up to > 7.4 software and none of the newer blade platforms. At the time I would > have said that Metaswitch would have worked quite well for what is being > asked, especially if wanting to split across many smaller gateways and > geographically distributed. Is there something with the new hardware and/or > software I don't know about quality-wise? > > Sonus killed off the GSX4000 which would have lent better to spreading > around a bunch of smaller boxes. They still have the GSX9000 which goes up > to single OC-3 cards (so you'd have to have a couple to split an OC-48 > still), but their main push seems to be the SBC5210 and SBC7000 which are > IP only, no TDM. But spread across gateways the call processing can easily > do the 500 CPS. > > On 4/21/2016 5:00 AM, Anthony Orlando via VoiceOps wrote: > > Avoid Meta at all cost. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Paul Timmins < <[email protected]> > [email protected]> wrote: > > You're going to handle 500CPS of legacy sonet based TDM and question > dropping 7 figures on the solution? *cringes* > > This is literally what platforms like metaswitch, sonus and many others > are made for. If you're looking for low cost, Taqua's solution is decent, > and if you need to take that entire OC-48, you're all but eyeballs deep in > Sonus or Metaswitch land. > > -Paul > > On Apr 20, 2016, at 17:54, Brooks Bridges <[email protected]> wrote: > > Looking for suggestions for NEBS compliant gear that can support SS7, > handle OC-3 or higher levels of channels, and can support (in aggregate) up > to around 500 cps through a **good** (key word) SIP interface. I’m > willing to entertain the idea of a single larger device that can take a > full OC-48 and support the full 500 cps, but I’d prefer spread the load > across multiple devices and smaller interfaces for load balancing and > redundancy. > > Any pointers? Obviously there are products out there by the really big > players, but I’d really rather not have to drop 7 figures on this project > unless I have to. > > Thanks! > > *Brooks Bridges | *Sr. Voice Services Engineer > *O1 Communications* > 5190 Golden Foothill Pkwy > El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 > *office:* 916.235.2097 | *main:* 888.444.1111, Option 2 > *email:* <[email protected]>[email protected] | *web:* <http://www.o1.com/> > www.o1.com > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing > [email protected]https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > >
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
