At 10:28 pm 02-08-04 -0500, you wrote: >Grimer.. you are a quick study..
Ooo....I've never been called that before. A brown study perhaps...or even the quick brown fox that jumped over the lazy dog. ;-) >now look at the tornado as a giant vortex tube. I'm all eyes 8-) >Do you have a "generator"? Err...mmm.....more than likely, I shouldn't wonder. >What if you produced the vortex from the >ground up by using a " vortex tube"? Or even one of those giant ice cream cones they pulverize chickens with. What are they called? Windhex - something like that. Mmm... better google it. I see - I forgot the e on the end. It's Windhexe. http://vortexdehydration.com/id37.htm Well, since your ISP seems to be located in Texas I'm sure that if you build a Beta-atmosphere over-unity generator and thereby solve the problem of diminishing oil supplies, you will be a prime candidate for the next Texan president of the U.S.of A. <g> Joking aside, your drawing attention to the evidence for what could well be the natural separation of the vapour powers is an important independent piece of evidence for the development of this thread. I'm glad one Vortexian's on the ball. :-) Many thanks, Cheers Grimer ----- Original Message ----- From: "RC Macaulay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:00 PM Subject: Re: ...upon the clouds of heaven... > The vortex I am referring to would be a tornado. The formation of this > vortex is fascinating. Within the cone of the vortex a condition exists for > formation of lightning. Many actual movies taken of moving tornados show > what first appears to be the vortex cone destroying power lines which short > and spark. A closer look at the films show a "glow" within the cone and no > power lines close. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Grimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 12:07 PM > Subject: Re: ...upon the clouds of heaven... > > > > > > >At 05:13 pm 01-08-04 -0500, I wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > >It would appear then that the tube is now merely a > > >thermodynamic curiosity. > > > > > > I was quite wrong there I'm afraid. :-( > > > > Apparently the tube has a wide range of useful industrial > > applications. The following is a good explanatory site. > > > > http://www.exair.com/vortextube/vt_frmain.htm#howitworks > > > > If you scroll down the page there is a excellent animated > > diagram which clearly shows how the tube separates the > > two flows. > > > > Interestingly enough, on the site page dealing with the > > history of the vortex tube the firm claim that "Theories > > abound regarding the dynamics of the Vortex tube." It would > > seem that this is possibly a fertile field for the kind of > > investigation to which "garage" explorers would be well > > suited. After all, it was invented "quite by accident" > > in the first place. > > > > Grimer > > > > > > > > > >
