It does not matter what we do to the dummy/fueled reactor pair, as long as the stimulation is equal, nother more matters.
Run a test with two dummies and show that ther temperatures are equal at the high end temperature range. Then run a dummy/fuel pair and show that the fueled reactor is 500C hotter at the maximun temperature range. This is simple to understand. The conclusion is that the fueled reactor is producing excess heat. On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:41 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Magnetic induction has problems as well. Nothing is going to substitute > for a calibrated calorimeter. And, in my opinion, direct heating with > resistive elements is the best way to get a true handle upon the input > power. Power, voltage, and current meters can be calibrated to extreme > accuracy and skeptics are left arguing against parameters that can be > proven. > > Even though the third party scientists went to great extremes to calculate > the heat generated by their HotCat, most believe that they had at least one > major flaw in their results. Had they used a well constructed calorimeter > many of these issues would have been resolved. > > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> > To: John Milstone <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, Jun 15, 2015 10:49 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:The good, the bad and the ugly > > Why not heating it with magnetic induction? >
