No, I have concentrated on pulsed radars, which pulse at 0-1000 Hz, considered very low frequencies.
Dave you are generalizing and have done no research yourself. Here is some: http://darkmattersalot.com/2015/05/19/and-you-thought-the-bp-oil-spill-was-bad/ On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:55 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > Of course if you limit your impact to those transmitters that communicate > with submarines then these very low frequency signals do travel into the > deeper water. But, so far it appears that you have placed all type of > radars, etc. into the same category, which is not reasonable. > > From what I read in the news there are ocean dead zones in many locations > that have little or nothing at all to do with RF transmissions. Many > reefs are dying where no transmitters are located nearby to contribute to > the problem. The concern about warming waters is a major one that is often > used to explain the dying and that is more likely than high frequency RF > transmissions. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 10:07 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying... > > Thanks for the numbers. > > This should be relatively straight forward to test: > > Set up two salt water aquariums supporting comparable coral > populations. Run them for a year or so to see they are stable. Then > subject one of them to low frequency EM radiation. > > PS: What I mean contraction in terms is that "pulse" implies high > frequency components and, indeed, is usually illustrated by time > differential on a square wave to filter out the low frequency components. > However, your point is well taken -- a short duration transmission of a > high power low frequency signal will penetrate salt water -- with a very > drastic reduction in power with depth, as your numbers show. > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:50 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Low frequency pulse. >> >> Also, we are not communicating with the marine life and coral reef, the >> evidence is mounting that 2 terrawatts of effective isotropic radiated >> power (EIRP) in a local area scattered by the overhead atmosphere is mildly >> shocking the marine life through electromagnetic induction and conduction >> through the salt water near the surface as it "grounds out" into the ocean. >> You can't fool mother nature sort of thing. >> >> Here is a model of induced electrical currents in seawater surface >> around just one ship's antennas. Now imagine 27 high power coastal based >> radars/antennas and 45 warship radars/antennas in one area. >> >> >> http://darkmattersalot.com/2015/05/14/how-cousteau-and-noaa-killed-the-reef/ >> >> >> Effects of Electrical Current* on the Body [3] >> <http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2002-123/2002-123f.html#end3> *Current* >> *Reaction* 1 milliamp Just a faint tingle. 5 milliamps Slight shock >> felt. Disturbing, but not painful. Most people can “let go.” However, >> strong involuntary movements can cause injuries. 6-25 milliamps (women)† >> 9-30 milliamps (men) Painful shock. Muscular control is lost. This is >> the range where “freezing currents” start. It may not be possible to “let >> go.” 50-150 milliamps Extremely painful shock, respiratory arrest >> (breathing stops), severe muscle contractions. Flexor muscles may cause >> holding on; extensor muscles may cause intense pushing away. Death is >> possible. 1,000-4,300 milliamps (1-4.3 amps) Ventricular fibrillation >> (heart pumping action not rhythmic) occurs. Muscles contract; nerve damage >> occurs. Death is likely. 10,000 milliamps (10 amps) Cardiac arrest and >> severe burns occur. Death is probable. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Low pulsed frequency is a contradiction in terms. >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:01 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Except low pulsed frequencies >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, James Bowery < jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:42 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint < >>>>> zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This is primarily meant for fellow Vort, ChemEng (Stewart), but >>>>>> some others may have an interest… >>>>>> >>>>>> Stewart, I think I may have a cause for your hypothesis re: a link >>>>>> between our modern radar systems and the dying of coral reefs… >>>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>> Time to break out the tin-foil hats??? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No need. Salt water shields against EM penetration. >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
