As posted before, water absorbs UV light about 100,000,000 times better than infrared light. This makes it a poor partner with any noble metal at producing polaritons at UV frequencies.
However, when chlorine is added to the palladium solution to form palladium chloride in the electrolyte, the absorption of UV light is greatly reduced. This favors polariton formation using UV light. See: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/229233040_Speciation_of_aqueous_palladium(II)_chloride_solutions_using_optical_spectroscopies adium( On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > On further examination, Ken may be on to an important insight here which > is relevant to LENR. Here is another reference with more detail. > > > > “Single-Atom Catalysts: A New Frontier in Heterogeneous Catalysis” > > YANG, et al. > > > > When read in the context of the recently mentioned Szpak interview, where > we see the highly credible report of 3 out of 10 meltdown events, using > only plain water but with palladium chloride in the electrolyte – this > makes me think that the magnetic field facilitated single atom palladium to > first densify and accumulate, and then after 3-4 days to react in bulk. > > > > *From:* Ken Deboer > > > > … most recently JM Thomas (Nature 17 Sept 2015) showed that single atoms, > of Pd especially, make better catalysts than nanoparticles. super > catalysts, in fact. > > > > > > Now that you mention it – if you look back at Pd-D cold fusion, one of the > most effective techniques is “co-dep” or co-deposition. > > > > In co-dep, palladium chloride is in the electrolyte, which means > essentially that individual ions of palladium are present. > > > > > > >
