Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: So they thought that the helium might have remained in the electrode. Is > this hunch correct? >
As it says, they never got a chance to check. No one knows if this is correct or not. But this is a lot more than a hunch coming from Miles. He is an expert in electrochemistry and metallurgy. > Right now on account of these three experiments alone, we have a very wide > spread in ratios. > It is not as wide as it looks. Most of the differences can be explained by differences in technique, such as whether they measure the helium remaining in the metal or not. > I suspect there will be other experiments that give a different ratio. > None that I am aware of. There are several other experiments in Italy. They gave the same answer, subject to differences in technique as I said. - Jed
