>From the demo, - There is a heat sink in the bottom. So the silver vapor condense there. - The silver is melted only once after the system runs everything is in a closed system apart from losses in the cooling - The area at the top is much higher than at the bottom. But the temperature at the bottom is much lower than the top there is a conflict in this and i'm unsure that Mills is right in that heat losses is mainly at the light collecting system. but he did for sure say that it is mainly wasting energy due to inefficiency of the cells.
It all depends on what COP you have in order to call it a successful design. I am also wondering how you deliver 250kw electricity from your car in the garage as Mills is implying. You would then have quite a heat source in your garage - quite a sauna there. /Stefan On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > The amount of power required to produce a reaction is huge including the > power to melt silver, to pump and the power to vaporize silver. There is > also a large amount of waster heat energy, The silver vapor will produce > silver nanopowder, How is that silver reclaimed and recycled? > > How can this design be gainful? > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Note - that despite the crap-load of magnificent claims Mills has been >> making for months on the massive COP, he says in the vid that he has no >> data on the photovoltaic conversion end of it. What !?! >> >> >> >> Yet he wants to move it to market real quick. UNBELIEVABLE. >> >> >> >> He needs at least a year of performance data before moving to market, but >> he says there is presently none. This is most reminiscent of all those New >> Mexico licensees for the previous bogus invention (of a long line of bogus >> inventions) - that were supposed to be in production back in… when? Uh, >> like 8 years ago. >> >> >> >> >> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/11/blacklight-power-energy-f_n_150270.html >> >> >> >> Where does BLP find investors this gullible and patient? At least Rossi >> claims to have a year of performance data under his belt. If he does, he >> will have no competition from “the brilliant one.” >> >> >> >> *From:* Eric Walker >> >> Here is where a demo of the open device starts: >> >> >> >> https://youtu.be/R0PYe-4090g?t=53m13s >> >> >> >> Just prior to that, Mills says: "Now there's no microwave here. There's >> no high voltage. This is plasma being created in atmospheric pressures, >> that's filling that entire chamber. That is an enormous amount of power -- >> there's no energy source that can be responsible for that." >> >> >> >> No doubt we're to conclude that we're seeing the side-effects of >> Hydrinos. The video itself reminds me a little of ball lightning: >> >> >> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_lightning#/media/File:Great_Balls_of_Lightning.jpg >> >> >> >> One proposed explanation for ball lightning is that soil is vaporized by >> an arc discharge, in which case you'd have a dusty plasma. My suspicion is >> that that somehow induces beta decay in the dusty plasma, creating a >> self-sustaining ball of hot electrons and Cherenkov radiation. BrLP may >> have found a way to harness that kind of process, using a precursor such as >> potassium or silicon. >> >> >> >> In ball lightning, there's often reports of a sulfur smell. A source of >> the sulfur could be the following decays, starting with silicon: >> >> - >> - 32Si => 32P + e- + neutrino + 13 MeV >> - 32P => 32S + e- + neutrino + 1.7 MeV >> >> Eric >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Jack Cole <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Looks like they made a video available of their welder-sun demo. ;) >> >> >> >> See: >> >> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0PYe-4090g >> >> >> > >
