Stefan should realize that proficiency with “theory” or with “invention” are vastly different skills. The first is primarily mental, the second is largely manual (with a dose of good-luck and assistance with theory).
There is little doubt that Mills could be (is) the consummate theorist and at the same time a lousy inventor. Correspondingly, Rossi fits the role of skilled builder who teamed up with Focardi for the mental part. Had Rossi been able to find a Mills instead of a Focardi, he probably really could have heated his lab in 2012 with an e-Cat instead of lying about doing so. Had Mills found a Rossi-type of builder in 2012, those seven Utility companies in New Mexico could be generating power now instead of Mills having to dodge and squirm about having yet another failure to deliver. From: Eric Walker Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: If you think that Mills is an empty bag of promises then why don't you challenge some of his academic work, like the experiments leading to EUV spectra. Non have step up and claimed that those results are wrong or have a credible natural explanation (axil publish a paper if you want acceptance here). A lack of (published) refutation does not mean a conjecture is correct, and says very little about the conjecture. I personally do not take a position on whether BLP are seeing excess power; I'm optimistic that they might be. About the EUV spectrum (and soft x-ray spectrum) -- this kind of spectrum might also be generated by the stopping of hot beta electrons, which will be a more plausible hypothesis to some than Hydrinos. Eric
