On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote:
Mills talked about the source voltage being "only 10V", but 10V has at > least the potential to deliver 10eV of energy. 10eV of energy is the > energy of a photon at 124nm in the extreme UV. His "only 10V" statement > was meant to dissuade the listener that high energy photons were not > possible directly from this source. Interesting point. I think Mills also mentioned soft x-rays early on, which are in the low keV. And the spectrum he spent time discussing had an endpoint somewhere above 100 eV. Such photons would presumably come from the excitation of inner shell electrons in heavier elements such as silver. Or the spiraling down of the electron to lower levels, if one is persuaded that there are Hydrinos. Is there a high energy tail in a 10V electric discharge? I was under the impression that there was not. A detail for which much is made of is that the photon spectrum is broadband. I think the Hydrino explanation was probably modified at one point to explain this experimental result. But it's also what one sees with beta electrons, which have a broadband energy profile, with the neutrino carrying off the remainder (and majority) of the energy. I'm open to BLP having something. I'm highly doubtful that Mills's theory explains it. Eric
