In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:03:44 -0700: Hi, [snip] >Thank you, Axil, for this link. It is slide 49, in particular to which I >am making reference. In this slide you can see the soft x-ray set of lines >around 20-60nm, and another set of deep UV lines from 120-300nm. What I >was saying is that the band from 120-300nm is explain-able from the 10V >source, capable of providing 10eV direct excitation, while the lines from >20-60nm are harder to explain. In fact, it is hard to measure this >spectrum ... I wonder what he used to measure it.
I note that the short wavelength peak appears to be at about 23 nm which corresponds to about 54 eV. This is interesting because that is about the energy available from the recombination of O++ with an electron, or also the amount left over for photon formation when the Hydrino(R) goes from p=1 to p=3. However according to http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/Cont_EUV_HOH-031215.pdf water (HOH) is supposed to be an m=3 catalyst, which would produce p=4 Hydrinos(R), so there should be a peak at about 10 nm, which doesn't appear in the graph. This may imply that the actual catalyst involved is O++ rather than HOH. That would mean he is getting about 100 eV / H atom rather than 200 eV / H. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
