One of the most interesting things to me about IH is that they don't seem to have exclusivity with Rossi. They are free to license technologies from other companies, and are thus free to be objective in the evaluation and presentation of these technologies. Their ship does not sink if Rossi's does.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:51 PM Frank Acland <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems so; Rossi said this today on the JONP: > > Andrea Rossi > March 11, 2016 at 1:57 PM > > Sebastian: > Yes, obviously, as everybody knows, Industrial Heat has the license to > manufacture the E-Cats in its Territory. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does IH have manufacturing rights to the E-cat? What technology does > > IH have the rights to? Where does IH get the fuel for the reactors > > that they build. Can IH produce the fuel? Does Leonardo supply wafers > > to IH? Is Leonardo the only company that can manufacture the E Cat? > > > > Does anybody know the manufacturing deal that exists between IH and > Leonardo? > > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:45 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:11:02 -0500: > >> Hi, > >> [snip] > >>>One possibility is that Rossi is doing something that rankles IH, and > >>>IH does not like it one bit. It goes like this: IH was all set to sell > >>>the 1 MW plant, but Rossi discovered a better LENR tech. Rossi decides > >>>to go with the new tech that requires more time to perfect. IH now > >>>must keep their investors happy with the delay of a year or more. > >>>Rossi says that he is in charge and this Quark is the way to go. IH > >>>says, we what to sell now, delay is causing us a boatload of trouble > >>>with customers, investors, defense, and the government, Rossi says, > >>>too bad, deal with it, I got to do what I got to do. > >> > >> I don't see any problem here. IH already has the technology for the 1MW > plant, > >> it's up to them whether they decide to sell devices based upon it or > not. > >> > >> In short they could sell 1 MW plants now, and switch to better > technology as it > >> becomes available. This is what all technology based companies do. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Robin van Spaandonk > >> > >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >> > > > > > > -- > Frank Acland > Publisher, E-Cat World > >
