Hydrofusion wrote:
New Investments Tom Darden, CEO of Industrial Heat, signed a cooperation agreement with a newly created strategic financial center in Beijing. The “Technology Ministry of Science and Innovation Park” will participate in technology transfer with 20 companies from the U.S. This sparked fear that the E-Cat technology recently patented in the U.S. would somehow become the sole property of the Chinese government. However, these ideas were assuaged, and China invested the equivalent of $121 million USD in LENR technology. There could be a huge pressure behind the release of the E Cat technology that Rossi is now bucking. Tom Darden, CEO of Industrial Heat now must also hold off the Chinese for another year. Tom Darden might be saying to Rossi, "If we can not get your technology, there are other LENR developers that can need our needs. Rossi tells Darden, I know you have your problems, deal with them and leave me alone. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > One possibility is that Rossi is doing something that rankles IH, and > IH does not like it one bit. It goes like this: IH was all set to sell > the 1 MW plant, but Rossi discovered a better LENR tech. Rossi decides > to go with the new tech that requires more time to perfect. IH now > must keep their investors happy with the delay of a year or more. > Rossi says that he is in charge and this Quark is the way to go. IH > says, we what to sell now, delay is causing us a boatload of trouble > with customers, investors, defense, and the government, Rossi says, > too bad, deal with it, I got to do what I got to do. > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: >> Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Ok, they want a bit more discipline- but have you idea what viable LENR >>> technology they could have beyond Rossi's ? >> >> >> I wouldn't know about other technology. Based on the Lugano report, I do not >> think Rossi's technology is viable. I have not seen more recent reports >> about it. >> >> The first Levi study seeming promising, but the Lugano report showed no >> excess heat, as far as I can tell. Granted, it was poorly done, so it is >> hard to judge. >> >> "Viable" is a slippery word. Many cold fusion experiments are promising, but >> none (other than Rossi) are claimed to be remotely close to a practical or >> viable source of energy. They can be compared to nuclear fission in 1939. >> >> - Jed >>
