One possibility is that Rossi is doing something that rankles IH, and IH does not like it one bit. It goes like this: IH was all set to sell the 1 MW plant, but Rossi discovered a better LENR tech. Rossi decides to go with the new tech that requires more time to perfect. IH now must keep their investors happy with the delay of a year or more. Rossi says that he is in charge and this Quark is the way to go. IH says, we what to sell now, delay is causing us a boatload of trouble with customers, investors, defense, and the government, Rossi says, too bad, deal with it, I got to do what I got to do.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Ok, they want a bit more discipline- but have you idea what viable LENR >> technology they could have beyond Rossi's ? > > > I wouldn't know about other technology. Based on the Lugano report, I do not > think Rossi's technology is viable. I have not seen more recent reports > about it. > > The first Levi study seeming promising, but the Lugano report showed no > excess heat, as far as I can tell. Granted, it was poorly done, so it is > hard to judge. > > "Viable" is a slippery word. Many cold fusion experiments are promising, but > none (other than Rossi) are claimed to be remotely close to a practical or > viable source of energy. They can be compared to nuclear fission in 1939. > > - Jed >
