Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, they want a bit more discipline- but have you idea what viable LENR > technology they could have beyond Rossi's ? > I wouldn't know about other technology. Based on the Lugano report, I do not think Rossi's technology is viable. I have not seen more recent reports about it. The first Levi study seeming promising, but the Lugano report showed no excess heat, as far as I can tell. Granted, it was poorly done, so it is hard to judge. "Viable" is a slippery word. Many cold fusion experiments are promising, but none (other than Rossi) are claimed to be remotely close to a practical or viable source of energy. They can be compared to nuclear fission in 1939. - Jed
