> All that needs to happen as the first order of proof - and it will convince > many skeptics - is to compare electrical usage day-by-day hour-by-hour with > thermal power delivered. Raw data must be available to test any summaries > which are provided by the "expert". How hard is that?
** Flash back alert ** The year was 1992-93 or thereabouts. The claim was excess heat and proof of a thermal anomaly based on heating water using less electricity than expected. The device itself did survive and is still in production. Jed Rothwell was in the thick of it. The thermal gain issue was never resolved to everyone's satisfaction, but there are satisfied customers to this day who think they are getting hot water for less cost than the electricity being used. Was the Griggs Hydrosonic pump an omen of things to come?
