thanks, now let's wait for the ERV or its essence (performances) I am sure many people in Andrea's near circles are already informed.
peter On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Jack Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > I should clarify that where I say Fulvio, I mean Fulvio Fabiani > <http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/11/25/fulvio-fabiani-discusses-rossi-and-the-e-cat-with-mats-lewan/> > . > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:40 AM Jack Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear Peter, >> Thanks. Yes, you can use it as is. >> Jack >> >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:30 AM Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear Jack, >>> >>> do you allow me to publish this in my blog EGO OUT? >>> as it is or add what you wish. >>> It well thought and clearly written, why should we limit the readers? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Jack Cole <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> What would convince people one way or another about whether the 1 MW >>>> plant works? >>>> >>>> The following is purely speculative, but if true could lead to a full >>>> resolution of the mystery of the E-Cat. Imagine that not long after Rossi >>>> changes the charges in the 1MW plant and tells IH that it is back to full >>>> efficiency, they say, "Great! Now move along Rossi to do your own >>>> research." ERV comes and picks up his instruments. Rossi leaves. In the >>>> meantime, Fulvio and others stay behind (who know how to operate the plant) >>>> and other scientists and engineers come in. At their leisure, and without >>>> the presence of Rossi, IH's scientists and engineers conduct their own >>>> tests of energy balance. >>>> >>>> At the end of these tests, they pull the fuel charges, and turn the >>>> plant back on. Without the fuel, their measurements show a COP of >>>> approximately 1. Of course, if they hooked up their instruments and got a >>>> COP of 1 with the fuel still installed, then testing ends quickly. Either >>>> they verify the effect or that the test was wrong. Either way it goes is a >>>> victory. >>>> >>>> If this did not happen, people may claim that Rossi tweaked operating >>>> variables until he could fool the instruments. Or they may claim that the >>>> ERV was chosen by Rossi or was unable to perform the test competently. >>>> >>>> In addition to the above (imagined) scenario, let's imagine one further >>>> thing. As Rossi claimed at the beginning of the relationship between IH >>>> and himself, IH is in full possession of the formula for making an E-Cat >>>> work. Their scientists/engineers have also been experimenting and >>>> conducting their own completely independent tests. If that is also true, >>>> then we would have even greater evidence that either the E-Cat works or >>>> never has. >>>> >>>> Jack >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>> Cluj, Romania >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>> >> -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
