Fabiani would be needed to keep the plant running while other scientists and engineers examine it. Why trust one just one ERV? I wouldn't trust Fabiani over Rossi, but I would trust IH or other scientists to do some additional testing to give a valid calibration. Fabiani is needed to keep the plant running while others examine it. We don't need another silly year-long test to determine if it works, but we do need an objective examination.
AFAIK, there has never been a valid calibration of any E-Cat in a test that I have read about. Even if IH has the plant without fuel, they could run a calibration at the various flow rates, input powers, and temperature ranges used in the test. This is not to convince the super-skeps, but rather to convince those who want a valid test. On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:39 AM a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > It doesn't matter what test is performed, the pseudo skeptics will find > some reason why it might be wrong. Why trust Fulvio Fabiani and not Rossi? > > So many people who have actually seen and worked on the E-Cat that if it > didn't work someone would said that. Yet no one has except Krivit whom > I read was hurt when he was caught trying to take a sample of the fuel. > The negativity comes from those that have no direct, first hand > information but just speculate how the tests might have been fixed. > > As Rossi said, only the sale of working reactors will quiet the > skeptics. Let's wait for the ERV's report. > >
