It is unfair to characterize Jack in this way. He devoted a great deal
of effort attempting to prove LENR was viable and it appeared to me that
he was seeing some interesting results in early experiments. Perhaps he
has changed his beliefs as of this time due to taking a second look at
his procedures.
I can understand how demoralized he must feel after all of that effort
but I feel confident that his opinions will change to a more positive
stance if the ERV report has substance. Give him some slack.
My work regarding positive thermal feedback modeling tends to support
many of the statements originating from Rossi. Until I see evidence
that energy is not generated by subjecting the magic formula fuel to
high temperatures I will hold my positive views. The earlier experiments
that has suggested that LENR was present also fit into my model parameters.
So lets all hold off on the personal attacks since they are not
productive. Besides, it is against the rules of vortex to engage in
such behavior!
Dave
On 04/10/2016 06:25 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
Jack,
Thank you for proving my point (Skeptics will not believe any test)
You have no idea what tests were run on the 1 MW plant by the EVR but
you have already dismissed it sight unseen.
"Brad,
I concur. Nobody talking here is a pseudo-skeptic. Every one of us
who is skeptical here has devoted a large amount of time (and money
for some of us) to reading, analyzing, thinking, and even directly
conducting many experiments. I have wanted the E-cat to work as much
as anyone, and understand how it is hard to give up that hope when you
have invested so much in seeing it through to a positive outcome. But
we can't let that cognitive dissonance cause us to continue down a
path of waste when there may be other more fruitful avenues.
Eventually, a person must say, "enough is enough" and realize a dream
is just a dream and open our eyes to look around for something real
and worth investing effort in. It is painful to do, but better than
continuing down that path.
Jack
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:36 PM Brad Lowe <[email protected]> wrote:
Wait for another inconclusive report written by a dunce or a paid
stooge? Rossi has wasted many man-years of our collective time. I am
done waiting.
And don't call me a pseudo-skeptic. We all would have been happy with
any report where a gas generator ran the E-cat which heated a body of
water. With a 1MW output, he could run that in a day to prove his
claim and win back his millions. Rossi doesn't have anything of
commercial value. Time to admit Rossi's grandfatherly demeanor and
confident lies fooled me and many others.
- Brad
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 1:05 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Brad Lowe wrote. "Goat-guy made a great comment on next big future
where he
> makes a very good guess as to how Rossi is faking the results of the
tests."
>
> Wait and see what the ERV report shows.
>
> I doesn't mater what the test it will not be enough to persuade pseudo
> skeptics. As Rossi said long ago, the only proof will be sales of
working
> reactors."
>.
