no problem:
 Eco la:



















*Patrick EllulApril 13, 2016 at 7:13 AMDear Andrea,Jed Rothwell alleges
that there is a second ERV of the 1 year 1MW plat test and that his report
draws an opposite conclusion to the the one from the ERV that you
described.Does this second ERV exist?Best regards,PatrickAndrea RossiApril
13, 2016 at 7:52 AMPatrick Ellul:Jed Rothwell is an intelligent person and
has a remarkable sense of humour. Obviously he is joking.The only ERV has
been the one accepted by contract from both the counterparts with a signed
agreement.It is true that IH had their men constantly in the plant all the
352 days of the tests, and never said anything was wrong. It is true that
for one year of the test they were free to bring with them anybody they
wanted to control everything, but they never raised any doubt or critique.
As well as it is true that Tom Darden, JT Vaughn and their investors from
Woodford and from China have been in the plant many times, bringing with
them their consultants, have talked with the director of JM in his office
of the factory, have made their investors talk with the director of JM, who
said good things giving good references, based on which Woodford has given
to Tom Darden 50-60 millions of dollars and the Chinese started with him a
200 million concern in China.Tom Darden , IT Vaughn also in this case
danced like opera ballet etoiles around their investors, the director of
JM, myself chanting ” Stellar, stellar”. No remarks of any sort have been
communicated from IH, Cherokee Fund or Woodfors, let alone the Chinese,
about the plant, the ERV, the Customer. Until our bill loomed. Witnesses
available. In due time and place.Warm Regards,A.R.*

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> see please Rossi's answer on his Blog
>> peter
>>
>
> I have difficulty navigating his blog. Would you kindly copy the answer
> here?
>
> - Jed
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to