Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: The value and quality of the ERV report is subjective, But in any contest > where the referee is agreed upon beforehand. >
This is not a sporting event. > If the referee makes a call that one side does not agree with, that > aggrieved party cannot take their ball and go home no matter how > incompetent the referee is. You take the loss with good sportsmanship and > pay the 89M. > You have no idea how business is conducted, or how contracts are disputed. If the "referee" in this case issues a judgement call which is physically impossible and which any credentialed expert agrees is nonsense, NO ONE WILL EVERY PAY $89 MILLION. Nothing like that ever happened in the history of business, and never would happen. That would be lunacy. Suppose Penon had claimed the thing produces 100 MW, or a gigawatt? Do you think they should pay up in that case? Suppose he said it produces more power than the sun? How impossible does the claim have to become before you concede that a business should not have to pay on the basis of a wild, absurd, untenable claim made by an idiot? What would stop Rossi from handing Penon $10 million in a bribe? - Jed
