a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
> I do not know if there is another complete report, but I do know that the > I.H. observer disagrees with the Penon report, for good reasons." > > Earlier I thought you wrote that Penon was incompetent and the report > valueless I think he is incompetent based on his 2012 report, as I said. I.H. says they disagree with the report. They say there is no heat. That makes the report valueless. I trust I.H.'s expertise in calorimetry more than I trust Penon's. > Now you say the report damns Rossi. > That's what I.H. says, not me. They say there is no heat. That damns the report. > Earlier you wrote there were two ERV's. Now it seems there is only one. > I think there are three people involved, Penon, Barry West and Fulvio Fabiani. That is my reading of the legal paper that Eric Walker kindly dug up. I do not know who is responsible for what, or how many reports were written, but in any case, I am sure that I.H. strongly disagrees with the Penon report. They made that clear in the press release and in additional comments to me. I hope the details will all be published eventually, but I cannot say when that might happen. > Rossi stated that he wanted to release the report but had not on his > attorney;s advice. How dO you know better? > I cannot discuss that now. I hope I can later today. Sorry to be mysterious, but I really do hope I can say something definitive about that topic soon. The rest, including the report, may remain shrouded in mystery. - Jed
