Jed,
All I was saying was that you don't need anything
being produced to confirm that the proper amount
of heat was being produced. Obviously it made
I.H. feel better that something was being made
with the heat. Why they didn't enter the
production side I don't know. I would be
surprised if they were actually prevented from
entering the premises, but maybe they were. They
approved the manufacturer according to the
contract so they knew what was being produced.
I'm sure we will find out when it gets to court.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 01:06 PM 5/16/2016, you wrote:
Robert Dorr <<mailto:rod...@comcast.net>rod...@comcast.net> wrote:
Â
Get real, the proof is in the flow rates and the
temperature delta. That is all that is required.
So you would pay $89 million without doing the
most obvious test imaginable? Without the most
elementary reality check? Even though it is
obvious from the floor plan, the outward
appearance of the building, overhead photos,
local zoning regulations, and much else that
there cannot possibly be industrial equipment
next door using this much heat. You would just
ignore all that and write a check?
Even if you want to stick to flow rates and
temperatures, you would be risking your life to
believe Rossi. He has demonstrated on many
occasions that he is incapable of measuring flow
rates and temperatures correctly. He almost
killed the people from NASA doing that wrong. I
would not go into the room where he is
conducting an experiment if all I had was his
measurements of flow and temperature.
- Jed
