a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:

> There were not "52 boxes" there were just four units working.


Look at the drawing and you will see that they are made up of multiple
boxes, as described in the lawsuit. As I said, that means there are a lot
of metal walls in close contact with the nickel and the heaters.



> No one outside of Rossi's camp can have "brushed up against them"


Yes, a woman did, during a public demonstration when one of the boxes was
sitting on a table. I have a video of it somewhere. This was an older
generation box but similar according to Rossi.

Mats Lewan provided the video, as I recall. He was there.

That box was also under insulation but it was pretty hot. Mats measured the
surface temperature. I do not recall what it was, but it was hot.


Rossi spent much of his time in the computer container that had a 3KW air
> conditioner.  Where did you get the idea Rossi never used a computer?
>

Actually he told me that. Several people who have visited him confirmed it.



> I agree with Robert Door that it should be possible to measure the
> performance of the plant by measuring the flow rate of the water and
> depending on the temperature of the output, if appreciably above 100C as
> steam . . .


Sure it would be possible. No one disputes that. However, to believe
Rossi's instruments and flow rate without verification would be insane,
given his track record for doing such measurements wrong. More to the
point, not doing a reality check check by going next door and looking at
the industrial equipment would be the very height of insanity and
irresponsibility under these circumstances. Would you really pay $89
million without doing that?



> No one knows the JM Products process that could well have been proprietary.


Whatever process it may be, since it consumes 1 MW of process heat, I am
quite sure you cannot fit it into 6,500 sq. ft.



>   A specially made piece of equipment would be unlikely to have a name
> plate giving the specifications.


All factory equipment of this nature must list such specifications by law.
You have to show electric power consumption, steam or process heat
consumption both minimum and maximum, pressure ranges, etc. Look at the
on-line specifications for dry cleaning steam equipment, kilns, building
heaters, food processing equipment, etc.

- Jed

Reply via email to