"Sure it would be possible. No one disputes that. However, to believe Rossi's instruments and flow rate without verification would be insane, given his track record for doing such measurements wrong. More to the point, not doing a reality check check by going next door and looking at the industrial equipment would be the very height of insanity and irresponsibility under these circumstances. Would you really pay $89 million without doing that?"
This is what is know as SPIN. The test was under control of the ERV not Rossi, The instruments were sealed, Who was not allowed to inspect the factory and who restricted this inspection? On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > > >> There were not "52 boxes" there were just four units working. > > > Look at the drawing and you will see that they are made up of multiple > boxes, as described in the lawsuit. As I said, that means there are a lot > of metal walls in close contact with the nickel and the heaters. > > > >> No one outside of Rossi's camp can have "brushed up against them" > > > Yes, a woman did, during a public demonstration when one of the boxes was > sitting on a table. I have a video of it somewhere. This was an older > generation box but similar according to Rossi. > > Mats Lewan provided the video, as I recall. He was there. > > That box was also under insulation but it was pretty hot. Mats measured > the surface temperature. I do not recall what it was, but it was hot. > > > Rossi spent much of his time in the computer container that had a 3KW air >> conditioner. Where did you get the idea Rossi never used a computer? >> > > Actually he told me that. Several people who have visited him confirmed it. > > > >> I agree with Robert Door that it should be possible to measure the >> performance of the plant by measuring the flow rate of the water and >> depending on the temperature of the output, if appreciably above 100C as >> steam . . . > > > Sure it would be possible. No one disputes that. However, to believe > Rossi's instruments and flow rate without verification would be insane, > given his track record for doing such measurements wrong. More to the > point, not doing a reality check check by going next door and looking at > the industrial equipment would be the very height of insanity and > irresponsibility under these circumstances. Would you really pay $89 > million without doing that? > > > >> No one knows the JM Products process that could well have been >> proprietary. > > > Whatever process it may be, since it consumes 1 MW of process heat, I am > quite sure you cannot fit it into 6,500 sq. ft. > > > >> A specially made piece of equipment would be unlikely to have a name >> plate giving the specifications. > > > All factory equipment of this nature must list such specifications by law. > You have to show electric power consumption, steam or process heat > consumption both minimum and maximum, pressure ranges, etc. Look at the > on-line specifications for dry cleaning steam equipment, kilns, building > heaters, food processing equipment, etc. > > - Jed > >
