1. Oystein Lande May 16, 2016 at 4:59 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=113#comment-1185668>
Dear mr. Rossi, You say you had 3KW HVAC coolest for the computer container. 1. This is not the same as e-cat container? 2. How much HVAC cooling did you supply to inside E-cat container to keep it at working conditions…? 2. Andrea Rossi May 16, 2016 at 6:10 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=113#comment-1185684> Oystein Lande: 1- No, we had two containers, one with the control systems, one with the E-Cats 2- In the E-Cat container there was no air conditioned, because inside that container the temperature was the same you have in any industrial thermic central. The temperature was warm obviously, but not too much, because all the hot parts were well insulated, also to conserve the energy. Reactors, steam pipes and water pipes were very well insulated. There was also a ventilation system that conveyed the warm air toward the windows of the ceiling. Normally we were not inside the E-Cat container, where we had to go only in case of reparations or maintainance; here the temperature was around 40°C. Warm Regards, A.R. On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If the Reactor is radiating ten to hundreds of kilowatts of heat, then the >> COP produced by the reactor is higher then that measured by the ERV using >> water flow. >> > > That is true. If it is radiating hundreds of kilowatts, the COP is higher. > That is how calorimetry always works. You never capture all the heat in the > flow. However, it is not radiating hundreds of kilowatts because if it > were, Rossi WOULD BE DEAD. He would be cooked. > > Got it? Dead! Passed on! No more! Ceased to be! Expired and gone to meet > 'is maker! Bereft of life. Rests in peace! His metabolic processes are now > history! Kicked the bucket, Shuffled off his mortal coil. > > > >> Just this wasted heat could will put the reactor into gainful power >> production status. >> > > Yes if only this were real heat instead of imaginary heat, you could add > it to the tally. Unfortunately, all of the real heat equals the input > power, and nothing more. > > - Jed > >
