Peter, I read it and it doesn't make a lot of sense. Please explain how energy can be "consumed". Energy is always transformed in a form to another. This is elementary physics. Unless they used some crazy unknown process to store energy the energy would be radiated soon or later. Did the "customer" found a way to create matter from energy at chemical reaction energy levels? That would be a very efficient energy storing mechanism and very fascinating indeed and in violation of several physical laws.
Giovanni On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also Peter can you explain the difference between use and consumed? What > that means? > Unless there was a black hole inside the building of the "customer" > doesn't matter what you do with the energy eventually the energy needs to > be somehow radiated or removed from the building to the outside environment > in a way or another. It cannot be "consumed". > It can maybe stored if this is what you mean but what kind of process can > store all that energy in this efficient manner? If the "customer" invented > such a storing process it would be even more valuable than a working ecat. > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Giovanni Santostasi < > gsantost...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Peter, >> It is not a straight answer at all. >> Where is Rossi evidence that there was a real chemical plant having any >> use of the energy at all? >> Yours are just incredible speculations. >> >> Giovanni >> >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> when things go too far, they must be stopped, situation calmed down >>> >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/08/aug-14-2016-lenr.html >>> -- >>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>> Cluj, Romania >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>> >> >> >
