By the way even black holes eventually radiate their energy though Hawkins
radiation.

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Giovanni Santostasi <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Peter,
> I read it and it doesn't make a lot of sense. Please explain how energy
> can be "consumed". Energy is always transformed in a form to another. This
> is elementary physics.
> Unless they used some crazy unknown process to store energy the energy
> would be radiated soon or later.
> Did the "customer" found a way to create matter from energy at chemical
> reaction energy levels? That would be a very efficient energy storing
> mechanism and very fascinating indeed and in violation of several physical
> laws.
>
> Giovanni
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Giovanni Santostasi <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Also Peter can you explain the difference between use and consumed? What
>> that means?
>> Unless there was a black hole inside the building of the "customer"
>> doesn't matter what you do with the energy eventually the energy needs to
>> be somehow radiated or removed from the building to the outside environment
>> in a way or another. It cannot be "consumed".
>> It can maybe stored if this is what you mean but what kind of process can
>> store all that energy in this efficient manner? If the "customer" invented
>> such a storing process it would be even more valuable than a working ecat.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Giovanni Santostasi <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Peter,
>>> It is not a straight answer at all.
>>> Where is Rossi evidence that there was a real chemical plant having any
>>> use of the energy at all?
>>> Yours are just incredible speculations.
>>>
>>> Giovanni
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> when things go too far, they must be stopped, situation calmed down
>>>>
>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/08/aug-14-2016-lenr.html
>>>> --
>>>> Dr. Peter Gluck
>>>> Cluj, Romania
>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to