Giovanni, Let's repeat: a) the test does not depend on what the Customer makes with the nergy makes useful things as chemicals or throws it away- via a sytem of more heat exchangers- steam water is in a closed circuit I told clearly consumed= extracted and removed. At such a high value experiment you can waste the energy. Why store it? You will see it soon. You have accused your comptriots of scamming, OK, but why of stupidity? Are they so suicidal to enter in this Trial if they cannot tell what has happened with the energy? Do you believe they take such risks? How do you explain the very late reaction of IH? Couldn't they observe zero excess heat in few days after the strat of the test? Do you like Jed's tales about the flowmeter and pipes half full? And do you really believe it is important what kind of doctorate has Penon?
The problem is not so much what Rossi said it is what IH did not say in time. What motivates you? Best wishes, Peter On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Giovanni Santostasi <[email protected] > wrote: > Peter, > I read it and it doesn't make a lot of sense. Please explain how energy > can be "consumed". Energy is always transformed in a form to another. This > is elementary physics. > Unless they used some crazy unknown process to store energy the energy > would be radiated soon or later. > Did the "customer" found a way to create matter from energy at chemical > reaction energy levels? That would be a very efficient energy storing > mechanism and very fascinating indeed and in violation of several physical > laws. > > Giovanni > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Giovanni Santostasi < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Also Peter can you explain the difference between use and consumed? What >> that means? >> Unless there was a black hole inside the building of the "customer" >> doesn't matter what you do with the energy eventually the energy needs to >> be somehow radiated or removed from the building to the outside environment >> in a way or another. It cannot be "consumed". >> It can maybe stored if this is what you mean but what kind of process can >> store all that energy in this efficient manner? If the "customer" invented >> such a storing process it would be even more valuable than a working ecat. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Giovanni Santostasi < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Peter, >>> It is not a straight answer at all. >>> Where is Rossi evidence that there was a real chemical plant having any >>> use of the energy at all? >>> Yours are just incredible speculations. >>> >>> Giovanni >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> when things go too far, they must be stopped, situation calmed down >>>> >>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/08/aug-14-2016-lenr.html >>>> -- >>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>> Cluj, Romania >>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
