"Just - to mke a 6 years fraud when you have no trace of excess heat is a performance!" Peter..
Yes, it is "masterpiece" using one of Rossi's favorite expression. A masterpiece of fraud. But not at all impossible if you are a fraudster and you have a lot of believers. That is the problem with belief. Think religion, alternative medicine, quackery of all kind. Religion has lasted thousands of years and what does it have to show? A lot of believers in all these areas of human activity. This why belief doesn't belong to science. On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > it is rather late but I will answer to this tomorrow. > > Just - to mke a 6 years fraud when you have no trace of excess heat is a > performance! > peter > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Giovanni Santostasi < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Also Peter, >> I resent that you attack Jed and dismiss him as a defender of IH. You >> call him in a satirical way IHoptimist. >> I don't think at all that people like Jed and others like me that despise >> the way Rossi behaves as shrills of IH. IH is not a saint but it is clear >> who is the worst scammer here. And there is nothing to be optimistic about >> this. It is incredibly sad and depressing. But one has to accept reality >> even when it is depressing. Rossi is an enemy of LENR not a friend. >> >> I have a PhD in physics and I'm aware both of the promises but also the >> possible pitfalls of this field. I was in my first year of college Physics >> studies (in Bologna) when the discovery of Pons and Fleischman was >> announced. I remember exactly the moment and place when it was announced in >> radio and television. There was so much enthusiasm and excitement both at >> the public level and among professors and students. I remember having long >> discussions with a professor that thought he understood how it all worked. >> And I remember even more clearly the disappointment and broken heart for >> what followed within a year. >> >> I stared to follow Rossi and ecats news several years ago because I >> thought it was an amazing story of redemption both for LENR and himself as >> a person. >> I wished the best and for the field and Rossi because if LENR proves true >> it would indeed the world for the better. >> >> But then more I understood what was beyond Rossi's claims and actions >> more I realized that he has absolutely nothing and it is obvious he is >> pulling another fraud. >> >> "Il lupo perde il pelo ma non il vizio" is a famous Italian saying ("The >> wolf can lose his fur but never his vice"), meaning "old habits die hard". >> >> Giovanni >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Giovanni Santostasi < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> A part of the energy. And that needs to be demonstrated by Rossi. It is >>> not trivial. And Rossi didn't say that is the case, he said it was used in >>> chemical reactions. That makes no sense. >>> >>> Giovanni >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> But I have explained about the heat exchangers. Energy consumed and >>>> sent underground. Do you exclude this simple possibility for apart of >>>> energy? >>>> peter >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Giovanni Santostasi < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Also Peter can you explain the difference between use and consumed? >>>>> What that means? >>>>> Unless there was a black hole inside the building of the "customer" >>>>> doesn't matter what you do with the energy eventually the energy needs to >>>>> be somehow radiated or removed from the building to the outside >>>>> environment >>>>> in a way or another. It cannot be "consumed". >>>>> It can maybe stored if this is what you mean but what kind of process >>>>> can store all that energy in this efficient manner? If the "customer" >>>>> invented such a storing process it would be even more valuable than a >>>>> working ecat. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Giovanni Santostasi < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Peter, >>>>>> It is not a straight answer at all. >>>>>> Where is Rossi evidence that there was a real chemical plant having >>>>>> any use of the energy at all? >>>>>> Yours are just incredible speculations. >>>>>> >>>>>> Giovanni >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> when things go too far, they must be stopped, situation calmed down >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/08/aug-14-2016-lenr.html >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>>>>> Cluj, Romania >>>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>> Cluj, Romania >>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
