Eric, The only thing that I would complain about IH is that they trusted Rossi too much. He is using this against them.
If it is true that IH received money from investors while they were doubting Rossi veracity then it is somehow a problem for them even if not fatal. They could have thrown their money after Rossi but bringing in external money without being sure about the technology and Rossi behavior it is a little problematic. But investment comes with risks so in absence of evidence that Rossi was fraudulent one could still understand why they would trying to continue the fund raising effort. But it is not perfectly kosher I think. But even if that was true it doesn't exonerate Rossi conduct at all. Giovanni On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Giovanni Santostasi < > [email protected]> wrote: > > IH is not a saint but it is clear who is the worst scammer here. >> > > Honestly, I haven't seen anything other than speculation that IH have done > anything improper. They've been admirably quiet this whole time. Through > all of this I get the impression they're pretty decent folks. > > People have been quick to attribute the actions of some of the friends of > Darden and Vaughn to IH itself. I get the sense these people just wanted > to stick up for them in the face of a lot of misleading statements that > were being made, but they were not specifically called upon to do > anything. It's 100 percent incorrect to draw any inferences to decisions > made by IH without specific information. People believe exactly what they > want to believe. > > Eric > >
