Jed, That is a good point and very reassuring. If IH told of their doubts to the investors, or if their position was easy to find online then it was just due diligence of the investors to understand the risks involved.
As I said if they were not 100 percent sure about Rossi being fraudulent warning investors of possible problems (but also possible opportunities if the eCat was real) was an ok thing to do in this case (I personally would have wanted to be more than 50 percent sure at least given I have been scammed before and it is a horrible experience). But in general is irrelevant and it seems Rossi uses this as his strongest argument against IH and it is completely ridiculous, smoke and mirrors as usual. Giovanni On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Eric, >> The only thing that I would complain about IH is that they trusted Rossi >> too much. He is using this against them. >> >> > >> If it is true that IH received money from investors while they were >> doubting Rossi veracity then it is somehow a problem for them even if not >> fatal. >> > > It was not a problem, because they must have told the investor they > doubted Rossi's veracity. While this was happening, they told a local > reporter in North Carolina they doubted Rossi, and they me and many other > people, so I think we can assume they also told the investor. If the > investor had Googled I.H. statements about Rossi I am sure he would have > found the statements to the reporter. > > I refer to the newspaper article describing the inspection of the lab in > North Carolina after Rossi moved the equipment to Florida. > > - Jed > >
