a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> You were "mistaken" about a lot of things. > 1. The was significant flow shown by the computer controlled pumps. > Enough for a COP of 13 alone. > I know nothing about the pumps, and I said nothing about them. My only comments were regarding the flow meter. The values it reported were probably far too high. > 2. The steam was super heated at 102.8 & atmos. pressure, not just hot > water as you claimed. > I do not see how it could be atmospheric pressure. It had to be forced into the other room by the pumps. As noted in Exhibit 5: For steam to flow, a pressure differential is required to overcome the losses in the pipe. Given the foregoing, this would require that the pressure on the JMP side of the building was significantly below atmospheric (vacuum) and that the steam would flow at extraordinary velocity. But this was obviously not the situation present at the location. > 3. The flow was not constant for the whole run as you claimed many times. > It was reportedly exactly 36,000 kg per day for a month. That is impossible. > 4. You were wrong that the COP was 1. > I do not think you have sufficient evidence for that. I think the ERV data shows there is no heat. - Jed
