a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) the conserved mass flow rate of the system from February to November > 2015 was on > average *33,558 kg/day (1,398 kg/h)*. > That may have been the average, but daily totals can only be in even thousands. The smallest unit on this flow meter is 1,000 liters.
So what we have here are 10 months of the ERV's averaged input water temp, > flow rate, output superheated steam temperature . . . > I doubt that 102 deg C is superheated. and pressure that seems to be more realistic than Jed's flow statement > > "It was 36,000kg/day every day and it never varied". > Well Jed that statement is now *"BUSTED"*. > I was unaware of the earlier data. Note however that Exhibit 5 also says: In fact, from June 30, 2015 through July 27, 2015, the effective flowed water in the unit was, according to your daily valuation report for that period, 36,000 Kg/d on each and every day, without deviation. See Exhibit B. How is that plausible? It should be virtually impossible to have that level of consistency even over just a one-week period, let alone a one-month period. I thought that was for the entire test. My mistake. - Jed
