a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: That seems HIGHLY unlikely.
Why? Where else would you put a flowmeter intended for liquid? It would not work in the steam. (Assuming there is actually steam.) Can you prove the flow meter was not downstream of the reservoir? > I do not know what you mean. Downstream from reservoir are the the reactors. I don't know if you could put one flow meter there. Downstream from them it is steam (or hot water at 102 deg C). Anyway, we know the pipe was half-full, and it would not be between the pumps and the heat exchanger. It has to be at a gravity return, and the only likely place for that is between the heat exchanger and the reservoir. > Murray;s say so is not proof. It is filed with the court. It better be true, or I.H. stands to lose $267 million. It is a heck of a lot better proof than anything Rossi says. > . . . If IH had a case I think they would have shown a piping drawing by > now. How do you know they have not done this? Because they have not provided a diagram to you, personally? Again and again you say that something you personally have not seen does not exist. - Jed
