Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: Can you give details, facts, iit was sealed and Penon has rfemoved the > seals, has he asked Murray, "come Joe, take a look to it"? >
What the heck does "sealed" mean? Where were these "seals"? In front of the orifice? The water has to freely flow through a flow meter, or the meter does not work. Have you ever seen a flow meter? You can look right into the orifice. Just unscrew the pipe and have a look. If you could not see inside a meter, the water could not flow through it. If you are thinking the seals were on the pipe, like sealing wax, I suppose the people from I.H. ignored them and went ahead and unscrewed the pipe. > Has Murray a photo of those stains? > I have heard they have all kinds of photos and detailed analyses. I have not seen them. > If the pipes are working half-empty > then the how does water flow in the vertical segements? > What vertical segments? There aren't any as far as I know. Rossi claimed there were, but he lied. > Have you idea about the absurdity of this scheme? > There is nothing absurd about it. Why do you think the manufacturer warns against using the meter with a half-empty pipe, if pipes are never half-empty? > You was asked to give a sketch of the piping showing where was placed the > flowmeter you answered it was placed so that the pipes where half full, > unsmart tautology. > What's unsmart about it? Anyone can arrange a pipe to be half full. Rossi had no trouble doing that. People looking at the system had no trouble seeing that is what he did. If you want a sketch, I suggest you ask Rossi for one. Beware though: he will lie, and claim there was a U (with vertical segments). You can come with any photo > of roofs with no ventillation. > See for yourself! Look at the photos. Where is the ventilation? If there were enough ventilation for 1 MW of heat, it would be plainly visible. Where is it? Why hasn't Rossi given you photos of it? I predict he will not upload any in response to the counter-suit. - Jed
