Jed,
The flow meter would be on the output pipe from the reservoir (near the
bottom of it), either before or after the pump feeding the reactors.
It is ludicrous to suggest it would be on the condensate return pipe
from the customer. If IH have supplied a piping drawing it is not in
the public documents in their response to the charge. If the flow meter
had been where you suggest they would have shown it.
AA
On 9/1/2016 10:21 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
That seems HIGHLY unlikely.
Why? Where else would you put a flowmeter intended for liquid? It
would not work in the steam. (Assuming there is actually steam.)
Can you prove the flow meter was not downstream of the reservoir?
I do not know what you mean. Downstream from reservoir are the the
reactors. I don't know if you could put one flow meter there.
Downstream from them it is steam (or hot water at 102 deg C).
Anyway, we know the pipe was half-full, and it would not be between
the pumps and the heat exchanger. It has to be at a gravity return,
and the only likely place for that is between the heat exchanger and
the reservoir.
Murray;s say so is not proof.
It is filed with the court. It better be true, or I.H. stands to lose
$267 million. It is a heck of a lot better proof than anything Rossi says.
. . . If IH had a case I think they would have shown a piping
drawing by now.
How do you know they have not done this? Because they have not
provided a diagram to you, personally?
Again and again you say that something you personally have not seen
does not exist.
- Jed
