Hi Robin, Thanks for taking the time to read it and comment. I can reply on a few ...
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:27 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:51:30 -0600: > Hi, > [snip] > > - Epos are a spinor solution, and apparently the electron and positron > > are found to be different “phases” of the same elementary particle – > the > > electron. > > > > > > - During the spinor orbiting of the electron and positron, the phase of > > each particle changes – the electron becomes a positron and at the same > > time the positron becomes an electron. The result of this “switching > > phase” is that the epo can present a DC dipole electric field. > > No phase change is needed for this. A positron and an electron in close > proximity already comprise a dipole. > Well, an epo is an orbiting pair - orbiting around their barycenter. So, it only appears as a dipole because of discretized time. According to Hotson, the discretized time causes the electron and positron positions to blink back and forth between being a particle and a wave. In particle space, it orbiting pair appears like a polarizable dipole. He says that when they are waves they can pass through each other which implies counter-rotation. > > >The > > phase where this switch occurs can be changed causing the dipole to > point > > in any direction for an individual epo. > > > > > > - Since the electron and positron are orbiting, the pair produces a > > magnetic dipole. > > I think this is wrong. To be orbiting one another, they must either both be > moving clockwise, or both anti-clockwise, in both cases they create no net > magnetic field at a distance, sine they have opposite electric charges. > I will have to study Hotson's argument for this, but he implies that they are counter-rotating. Thus, they will produce a dipole magnetic field. It is somewhat difficult to follow the argument, because part of it is the spinor solution of the Dirac equation. > > >This is the fundamental magnetic dipole. There is no > > such thing as a magnetic monopole. The fundamental particle is the > > electron and its phase shifted companion the positron which form > epos. Epos > > can only produce a magnetic dipole. > > > > > > - Like magnetized spheres, the epos will naturally form a lattice, > > primarily oriented by the magnetic dipoles. > > I think a better analogy would be an salt crystal, e.g. NaCl. bound by > electrical forces, not magnetic. > > > > > > > - Epos have no inertial or gravitational mass. > > I don't think we can conclude this. Just as a test mass in the center of > the > Earth would experience net zero gravitational force from the planet, so > any mass > in the universe would experience net zero gravitational force from the > uniform > epo field. > Hotson says that only positive energy charges have mass and the epos are part of the negative energy sea. > [snip] > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
