The COP according to the blackbody, even with noise, should be above
10,000, with the output being of the order 1000W. It should be easy to make
a self sustaining demonstration if that was a true device.
2017-11-26 19:00 GMT-02:00 Esa Ruoho <esaru...@gmail.com>:
> Yeah whoever thought it was a good idea to let Andrea Rossi speak without
> a microphone in a room full of hum (I've tried processing it, it's hopeless
> and I don't have the time or inclination to go deeper into it) should be
> sent a microphone a day for the rest of their life.
> On 26 November 2017 at 17:44, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote:
>> I think Jones was too kind. It was not a demo. It was three hours of
>> dithering. Mats should be embarrassed by the sound control if nothing else.
>> I wondered what Rossi's trick would be this time. It was acting like a
>> person who has no clue what he is trying to accomplish.
>> I guess this makes me a 'pathoskeptic'.
>> I think A.R. owes all of us three hours for the amateur hours he
>> presented to us. The Swedish Academy has little to be proud of here.
>> *From:* Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, November 25, 2017 1:18 PM
>> *To:* firstname.lastname@example.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Ross E-Cat QX demo Nove 24
>> I don't agree. The measurements of energy out & in were good enough to
>> demonstrate the basic characteristics of the QX. That was the purpose of
>> the demo. I t would be impossible to to do a replicable experiment without
>> giving the IP away.
>> The pathosskeptics make much of the crude power pack with 60 W of cooling
>> But I don't believe that power could be magically transferred to heat the
>> water. What could Rossi possibly get from such a scam? It's not to get
>> money from the general public but possibly to interest venture capitalists:
>> they would do their own due diligence, such as measuring the voltage across
>> the reactor.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net>
>> To: vortex-l <email@example.com>
>> Sent: Sat, Nov 25, 2017 10:16 am
>> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ross E-Cat QX demo Nove 24
>> Video of demonstration:
>> Funny that few comments are coming out on this - other than from Mats,
>> who would benefit if this demo meant anything positive.
>> In fact, it is not a demo in any real sense … it is disappointing theatre
>> to all but the Rossi-flock. In no way does this salvage Rossi’s
>> credibility with scientists, nor that of Levi and the Swedes, who still
>> look like dupes who should, but will not, retract their egregious errors at
>> There is no useful information being supplied which can lead to
>> verification or replication. Voltage appears to have been estimated from
>> resistance… with pulsed power, that is a no-no and thus the input could
>> have been hundreds of times greater than suggested. Why not measure input
>> power at the plug and include the cooling power since it is required?
>> Given Rossi’s three decade long record of fraud and deceit as a backdrop
>> – either independent replication or a commercial product will be the only
>> thing that can help.
>> So far, this is little more than a crude repeat of the past 6 years
>> except now there is even less relevant information to use in replication
>> than with the past failures. Few will waste their time.
> http://linkedin.com/in/esaruoho // http://twitter.com/esaruoho //
> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com //
> +358403703659 <+358%2040%203703659> // http://lackluster.org //
> skype:esajuhaniruoho // iMessage esaru...@gmail.com //
> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com // http://deposit4se.tumblr.com //
> http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial //
Daniel Rocha - RJ