Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
> The measurements of energy out & in were good enough to demonstrate the > basic characteristics of the QX. > The measurements were bogus. They revealed nothing. > That was the purpose of the demo. I t would be impossible to to do a > replicable experiment without giving the IP away. > The opposite is true. It would have easier to do a pure black box demonstration with a watt-meter. Assuming the effect is real, that would be more convincing and yet it would reveal less information about the device. > The pathosskeptics make much of the crude power pack with 60 W of cooling > But I don't believe that power could be magically transferred to heat the > water. > That is absurd. No one makes that claim. The power pack is producing a great deal of heat. Therefore it must be consuming a great deal of power. How much? We have no idea, but a simple watt-meter such as the Kill-a-watt would have revealed this. However inefficient the power supply may be, it is not likely to be putting out only a tiny fraction of the input power to the device. > What could Rossi possibly get from such a scam? It's not to get money > from the general public but possibly to interest venture capitalists: they > would do their own due diligence, such as measuring the voltage across the > reactor. > Rossi aims to swindle foolish wealthy venture capitalists, not the general public. Foolish venture capitalists such as the people who wasted $120 million Juicero: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/01/juicero-silicon-valley-shutting-down - Jed
