it would be easy with a COP of 50 propose a convincing blackbox test.
On input side, put a battery of limited power/energy, then add a power
supply (inverter, step-up converted... ask Maxim) of fair efficiency, and
on the other warm  simple thing, like boiling tea, melting ice.

it is not convincing with 30% XH, but for 50000% XH, even a donkey can show
it works.



2017-11-26 21:26 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>:

> Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>> The measurements of energy out & in were good enough to demonstrate the
>> basic characteristics of the QX.
>>
>
> The measurements were bogus. They revealed nothing.
>
>
>
>>   That was the purpose of the demo.  I t would be impossible to to do a
>> replicable experiment without giving the IP away.
>>
>
> The opposite is true. It would have easier to do a pure black box
> demonstration with a watt-meter. Assuming the effect is real, that would be
> more convincing and yet it would reveal less information about the device.
>
>
>
>> The pathosskeptics make much of the crude power pack with 60 W of cooling
>> But I don't believe that power could be magically transferred to heat the
>> water.
>>
>
> That is absurd. No one makes that claim. The power pack is producing a
> great deal of heat. Therefore it must be consuming a great deal of power.
> How much? We have no idea, but a simple watt-meter such as the Kill-a-watt
> would have revealed this. However inefficient the power supply may be, it
> is not likely to be putting out only a tiny fraction of the input power to
> the device.
>
>
>
>>   What could Rossi possibly get from such a scam?  It's not to get money
>> from the general public but possibly to interest venture capitalists: they
>> would do their own due diligence, such as measuring the voltage across the
>> reactor.
>>
>
> Rossi aims to swindle foolish wealthy venture capitalists, not the general
> public. Foolish venture capitalists such as the people who wasted $120
> million Juicero:
>
> https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/01/juicero-silicon-valley-
> shutting-down
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to