Yeah whoever thought it was a good idea to let Andrea Rossi speak without a microphone in a room full of hum (I've tried processing it, it's hopeless and I don't have the time or inclination to go deeper into it) should be sent a microphone a day for the rest of their life.
On 26 November 2017 at 17:44, Brian Ahern <[email protected]> wrote: > I think Jones was too kind. It was not a demo. It was three hours of > dithering. Mats should be embarrassed by the sound control if nothing else. > > > I wondered what Rossi's trick would be this time. It was acting like a > person who has no clue what he is trying to accomplish. > > > I guess this makes me a 'pathoskeptic'. > > I think A.R. owes all of us three hours for the amateur hours he presented > to us. The Swedish Academy has little to be proud of here. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Adrian Ashfield <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Saturday, November 25, 2017 1:18 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Ross E-Cat QX demo Nove 24 > > I don't agree. The measurements of energy out & in were good enough to > demonstrate the basic characteristics of the QX. That was the purpose of > the demo. I t would be impossible to to do a replicable experiment without > giving the IP away. > > The pathosskeptics make much of the crude power pack with 60 W of cooling > But I don't believe that power could be magically transferred to heat the > water. What could Rossi possibly get from such a scam? It's not to get > money from the general public but possibly to interest venture capitalists: > they would do their own due diligence, such as measuring the voltage across > the reactor. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: JonesBeene <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Sat, Nov 25, 2017 10:16 am > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ross E-Cat QX demo Nove 24 > > > Video of demonstration: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkj-7whwpUk > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dlkj-7whwpUk&data=02%7C01%7CAhern_Brian%40msn.com%7C8866ac17cc374e7ffe1a08d53430eb81%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636472307065728412&sdata=Cb%2B4ycYhrdlRi8R0qkUV9WkXwzBzsX6yToSPHwj59eQ%3D&reserved=0> > > Funny that few comments are coming out on this - other than from Mats, who > would benefit if this demo meant anything positive. > In fact, it is not a demo in any real sense … it is disappointing theatre > to all but the Rossi-flock. In no way does this salvage Rossi’s > credibility with scientists, nor that of Levi and the Swedes, who still > look like dupes who should, but will not, retract their egregious errors at > Lugano. > There is no useful information being supplied which can lead to > verification or replication. Voltage appears to have been estimated from > resistance… with pulsed power, that is a no-no and thus the input could > have been hundreds of times greater than suggested. Why not measure input > power at the plug and include the cooling power since it is required? > Given Rossi’s three decade long record of fraud and deceit as a backdrop – > either independent replication or a commercial product will be the only > thing that can help. > So far, this is little more than a crude repeat of the past 6 years except > now there is even less relevant information to use in replication than with > the past failures. Few will waste their time. > > > -- http://linkedin.com/in/esaruoho // http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com // +358403703659 // http://lackluster.org // skype:esajuhaniruoho // iMessage [email protected] // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com // http://deposit4se.tumblr.com // http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial //
