In the calibrated trace, which you may not be seeing, it is not 1/f^2
exactly.  Also, there will be absorption and scattering in going through
the reactor that will affect the shape of the curve.

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 9:28 AM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:

> OK – but the context of what is being graphed  is not clear ---
>
>
>
> Is Trace 7 real or calculated? Maybe Trace 7 has been manipulated to show
> a desired fit.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Nigel Dyer <l...@thedyers.org.uk>
>
> It is like both like a Maxwellian distribution and Bremstrahlung, but
> neither of these give a 1/f^2 distribtion. If you overlay a 1/f^2 line over
> the red dots the fit is perfect, indeed it is so good that it almost looks
> as if that is how it was generated.
>
> JonesBeene wrote:
>
>
>
> Looks quasi-Maxwellian to me.
>
>
>
> Where is the inverse peak?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Nigel Dyer <l...@thedyers.org.uk>
>
>
>
> I have been looking at the graph titled
>
> "After the MASSIVE broad band 'turn on' pulse, the excess heat mode is
>
> between 0 and 100KeV"
>
>  at
>
> http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/home/mfmp-blog/
> 519-the-cookbook-is-in-the-signal
>
> which shows the steady state gamma radiation from the Parkhomov-like
>
> experiment, together with a plot of the gamma radiation that is seen
>
> right at the start.
>
> It appears that the initial gamma radiation obeys a perfect inverse
>
> frequency squared law.  I feel that this must be telling us something
>
> about the underlying physics, but it is not clear what.  I cannot find
>
> any other examples of inverse frequency squared emission of radiation.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Nigel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to